Recall Cliffordxc2x92s argument for evidentialism in Module 2. Pascal, James, and Bergmann all break sharply with Cliffordxc2x92s evidentialist conclusions, but what, if anything, do they say to help abate Cliffordxc2x92s main worry, namely, that belief without evidence’

nRecall Cliffordxe2x80x99s argument for evidentialism in Module 2. Pascal, James, and Bergmann all break sharply with Cliffordxe2x80x99s evidentialist conclusions, but what, if anything, do they say to help abate Cliffordxe2x80x99s main worry, namely, that belief without evidence often leads to trouble? 200 words ‘

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply